Black Star Farms LLC v. Oliver
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
This case involves a Michigan winery’s claim that certain provisions of Arizona’s statutory scheme regulating the direct shipment of wine from wineries — whether located in-state or out-of-state — to Arizona consumers violate the dormant Commerce Clause. The Plaintiffs-Appellants (collectively “Black Star Farms”) claim that those provisions, in practical effect, unlawfully discriminate against out-of-state wineries.
Arizona generally requires all alcoholic beverages sold to consumers in the state to pass through a three-tier distribution system comprised of producers,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Richard W. CoreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- International Franchise Ass'n v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Independent Training & Apprenticeship Program v. California Department of Industrial RelationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Lebamoff Enterprises, Inc. v. HuskeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Hartman v. United Bank Card, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.