Legal Opinion

Black Star Farms LLC v. Oliver

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 13, 2010No. 08-15738PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a Michigan winery’s claim that certain provisions of Arizona’s statutory scheme regulating the direct shipment of wine from wineries — whether located in-state or out-of-state — to Arizona consumers violate the dormant Commerce Clause. The Plaintiffs-Appellants (collectively “Black Star Farms”) claim that those provisions, in practical effect, unlawfully discriminate against out-of-state wineries.

Arizona generally requires all alcoholic beverages sold to consumers in the state to pass through a three-tier distribution system comprised of producers,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Richard W. CoreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. International Franchise Ass'n v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Independent Training & Apprenticeship Program v. California Department of Industrial RelationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Lebamoff Enterprises, Inc. v. HuskeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Hartman v. United Bank Card, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API