Legal Opinion

Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 2, 1978No. 77-10PublishedCited by 840 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

A Maryland statute provides that a producer or refiner of petroleum products (1) may not operate any retail service station within the State, and (2) must extend all “voluntary *120allowances” uniformly to all service stations it supplies.1 The questions presented are whether the statute violates either the Commerce or the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, or is directly or indirectly pre-empted by the congressional expression of policy favoring vigorous competition found in § 2 (b) of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 49 Stat. 1526.2…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by840 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

835 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API