Legal Opinion
Independent Training & Apprenticeship Program v. California Department of Industrial Relations
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 18, 2013No. 11-17763PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1028OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Pursuant to the National Apprenticeship Act of 1937 (also known as the “Fitzgerald Act”), federal regulations govern the employment of apprentices on public works projects qualifying as “Federal purposes,” a term that is defined under the regulations. Plaintiff Independent Training and Apprenticeship Program (“I-TAP”) is registered with the Department of Labor (“DOL”) as an approved apprenticeship program for such Federal purposes. I-TAP is not, however, recognized by California as a state-approved apprenticeship program. Consequently, I-TAP enrollees may not be…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- The Arc of California v. Toby DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jesus Zuniga Romero v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Gabriel Moran v. the Screening ProsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.