ABBA Rubber Co. v. Seaquist
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, J.
—In an action concerning the alleged misappropriation of trade secrets, the trial court issued a preliminary injunction, restraining the defendants from soliciting any former customers of the plaintiff. The defendants challenge the plaintiff’s entitlement to injunctive relief, the form and scope of the injunction, and the adequacy of the amount of the undertaking specified by the trial court. Concluding that the injunction is vague and that the amount of the undertaking is insufficient, we reverse the order.
Factual Background
Roy J. Seaquist began manufacturing rubber…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- IT Corp. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Celeritas Technologies, Ltd., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Imax Corporation v. Cinema Technologies, Inc. Neil JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Morlife, Inc. v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.