Legal Opinion
Application Group, Inc. v. Hunter Group, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 23, 1998No. A071528PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PHELAN, P. J.
The Hunter Group, Inc. (Hunter or appellant), timely appeals from a judgment by which the San Francisco Superior Court declared that covenants not to compete contained in the employment contracts of Hunter consultants who do not reside in California are illegal in the circumstances of this case, and cannot be enforced against respondents The Application Group, Inc. (AGI), a California-based corporation, and Dianne Pike (Pike), a resident of Maryland and former Hunter consultant who was recruited to work for AGI in California in 1992. The trial court’s judgment was based on…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Saunders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bernhard v. Harrah's ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Isuzu Motors Ltd. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.