Legal Opinion

Village of Pillager v. Hewett

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1906No. Nos. 14,798-(111)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an. order of the district court for Hennepin county, John Day Smith, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial before Elliott, J., who found in favor of defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

START, C. J.2

Action to recover from the defendant the sum of $500 and village bonds to the amount of $1,300 paid and delivered by the plaintiff village to the defendant upon an alleged void contract for building a bridge for the village by the defendant. The cause was tried by the court without a jury. Findings of fact were made by the court, and as a conclusion of law, judgment was ordered for the defendant denying the plaintiff any relief, and the plaintiff appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

*266The principal question presented by the record for our consideration is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. Borough of Henderson v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. Farmer v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Wester v. HedbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Tobin v. Town CouncilWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Elview Construction Co. v. North Scott Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. The Gamewell Company, a Corporation v. The City of Phoenix, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Bozied v. City of BrookingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API