Roberts v. Whitaker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
This action was brought to enjoin enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum issued by Robert A. Whitaker, public examiner of the State of Minnesota. Plaintiff, Donald V. Roberts, also moved to quash the subpoena. The State of Minnesota responded with a motion to dismiss the action because the complaint failed to state a. cause of action. Following a hearing on the motions, the district court issued an order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the action, granting plaintiff’s motion to quash the subpoena, and certifying that the questions presented are important and doubtful for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re an Inquiry Concerning AgerterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re an Inquiry Concerning AgerterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984