Legal Opinion

Rettman v. City of Litchfield

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 31, 1984No. C1-83-1091PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

This appeal raises the issue of whether quasi-contractual relief is available to a provider of services for a project initiated under Minn.Stat. ch. 429 (1982), governing local improvements and assessments, where the parties failed to comply with the procedures mandated by chapter 429. The jury found that the City of Litchfield (hereinafter city) had led plaintiff Edward Rett-man to believe he was hired to install a water main extension on his development property, that the city had benefited from Rettman’s work, and that he was entitled to recover the cost of the installation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seidl v. Trollhaugen, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Lundin v. Township of Butternut ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Olsen v. Independent & Consolidated School District No. 50Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Kotschevar v. Township of North ForkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Obst v. Microtron, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Navarre v. South Washington County SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Pouliot v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. M.L. v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API