Legal Opinion

Layne Minnesota Co. v. Town of Stuntz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1977No. 46703PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLAUGHLIN, Justice.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, Layne Minnesota Company (Layne), for the balance owed on a contract for drilling a water supply well for the town of Stuntz (Stuntz), a municipal corporation in St. Louis County. Stuntz counterclaimed to recover a partial progress payment made to Layne during the performance of the contract. The trial court found the contract void for failure to comply with the applicable competitive-bidding statute and denied recovery to both parties. Layne appealed from the judgment and Stuntz sought review of the dismissal of its counterclaim. We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Duenow v. LindemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of CallawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Randolph County Board of Education v. ScaliaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. City of PrescottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Rettman v. City of LitchfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Gust v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API