Legal Opinion

Scott v. Gallot

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1943No. Civ. 12295PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Defendants appeal from an order granting a motion for new trial, after verdict and judgment in their favor, in an action brought by plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries. The appeals are presented by defendants on separate briefs, but all parties are agreed that the main question involved relates to the relevancy of certain evidence as to custom and practice, which the trial court ordered stricken out, and thereupon instructed the jury that it should not consider the same for any purpose in determining the issues of the case.

The accident occurred under the following…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Texas Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Burke v. John E. Marshall, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Warnke v. Griffith Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Thomas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Clarke v. Volpa Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blank v. Palo Alto-Stanford Hospital CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Muir v. Cheney Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Fowler v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Huber v. Henry J. Kaiser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API