Legal Opinion

Huber v. Henry J. Kaiser Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1945No. Civ. 12845PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries suffered by plaintiff, referred to in the transcript of evidence as a “cement foreman” though his supervisory work also covered the installation of steel. The verdict of the jury was in favor of defendants.

The facts appear as follows: At the place where the accident occurred there were two large basins in which floating dry docks were being built. The basins fronted on the river, and a temporary dirt levee across the south end of the basins kept the water out while the drydoeks were in the course of construction. At the time of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Medlin v. SpazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tate v. CanonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. De Cruz v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equipment Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Slayton v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equipment Co.California Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API