Legal Opinion

Warnke v. Griffith Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1933No. Docket No. 7867PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

From a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for personal injuries plaintiff has appealed.

For convenience of description we shall assume that near the scene of the accident involved here East Fourth Street in the city of Los Angeles runs east and west and the intersecting streets run north and south. Merrick Street intersects it at right angles from the north, but does not extend beyond it: About one city block west of this intersection Hewitt Street comes into Fourth from the south. The city of Los Angeles, at the time in question, was improving East Fourth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Vedder v. BireleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Jones v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Kenna v. Cent. Pac. R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Tucker v. LombardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. McNear v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Burke v. John E. Marshall, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Kuist v. CurranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API