Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Volpa Bros.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1942No. Civ. No. 2679PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

In October, 1940, the Division of Highways of the State of California was constructing a new bridge just west of the town of Minkler, near Fresno. Respondent Pete Volpa was a truck driver employed by the respondent Volpa Brothers and was engaged, at the time of *175the happening of this accident, in hauling gravel from a gravel pit located on private property to a point on the highway where the new bridge was being constructed. Leading from the highway, and along the edge of the gravel pit, an area had been “bulldozed” to make a private roadway for the loading trucks. Empty trucks coming westerly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burke v. John E. Marshall, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Warnke v. Griffith Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Comstock v. MorseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Rosella v. PaxinosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Ryan v. Los Angeles Ice & Cold Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pauly v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Drotleff v. RenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Connell v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Reed v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Prescott v. City of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API