Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1954No. L. A. 22855Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent.

I am of the opinion that it was prejudicial error to admit evidence of the “average speed” traveled by vehicles in the area of the accident in view of the testimony showing that the area in question was posted with 25-mile-an-hour speed limit signs. It has been held numerous times by this court and by appellate courts of this state that the question of negligence, or lack of negligence, is not to be determined by what others did or did not do at the time and place under the particular facts and circumstances then and there confronting them, including the important and undisputed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Rudd v. ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People v. CrossanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Sheward v. VirtueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hurtel v. Albert Cohn, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API