Legal Opinion

Cousino v. Western Shore Lumber Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1918No. S. F. No. 7987PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem.

This action was brought to determine the adverse claim of the defendant to 480 acres of land in San Mateo County under the provisions of section 738 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The defendant denied title in the plaintiffs to any portion of the property, and in a cross-complaint asserted ownership of the property in itself. The facts of' the case are practically without conflict, and are briefly these:

Mary Huot, a Sioux mixed blood Indian woman, was born on the Lake Pepin Reserve in Minnesota in the year 1850. Pursuant to an act of Congress passed July 17, 1854 (10…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Coryell v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Brumagim v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Spotts v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Holladay v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Lightning Delivery Co. v. MattesonArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Red River Lumber Co. v. NullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Buckelew v. GoreDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  5. Yunuen Garcia, as Administrator for Estate of Sugey A. Garcia Chavez v. Doe White Trucking CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API