Legal Opinion

Lightning Delivery Co. v. Matteson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1935No. Civil No. 3445PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

This is an action by Sara V. Matteson against the Lightning Delivery Company to recover possession of certain goods and chattels or their value. The case was heard by the court sitting without a jury, and from a judgment for the plaintiff and an order denying a motion for a new trial, the defendant appeals.

The facts shown by the record are substantially these: The plaintiff, her husband, William F. Matte-son, and their only child, a daughter eleven years of age, came to Phoenix early in 1931. On September 26th of that year, and in contemplation of a separation following domestic troubles,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tourette v. TouretteArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Schofield v. GoldArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Holladay v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Wilson v. HunterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Gilbert v. HowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. SchwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Shoenhair v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  3. Rodieck v. RodieckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Testa ex rel. Testa v. Emeritus Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  5. Collins v. O'ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API