Spotts v. Hanley
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This action is in ejectment for certain lots of land in blocks 11 and 12, lying in that portion of the city and county of San Francisco called the Potrero Huevo.
The defendants had judgment rendered in their favor by the court, which tried the action without the intervention of a jury. The appeal here prosecuted is from an order refusing to set aside that judgment and grant a new trial.
The appellants seem to rely mainly for a reversal of the order upon three grounds: 1. The evidence was insufficient to warrant certain of the findings; 2. That the court failed to find upon a material…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brumagim v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Brenham v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Knight v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Allen v. ReadTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Cunningham v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. Marilyn Monroe LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Kaiser v. DaltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Gassin v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.