Legal Opinion

Goodrich v. Mortimer

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1919No. Civ. No. 3118PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Leslie R. Hewitt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action against John Drew Gay and others to quiet title to a lot situate in the town of Lancaster, alleging himself and his predecessors to have been in the actual, exclusive, and adverse possession thereof, continuously for twenty years, claiming the same against the world, and having paid all taxes for the statutory time required to perfect adverse possession. After filing the complaint, appellant C. White Mortimer, administrator of the estate of Gay, was substituted as defendant. The administrator filed a cross-complaint and brought into the action certain parties…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Moon v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Lofstad v. MuraskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Packard v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Montgomery & Mullen Lumber Co. v. QuimbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bruch v. Benedict Barnes Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Marengo Cave Co. v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bernstein v. DodikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Weyse v. BiedebachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Blume v. MacGregorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API