Legal Opinion

Red River Lumber Co. v. Null

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1924No. Civ. No. 2680PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPinch, P. J.

In this action the plaintiff prayed for a decree establishing its right to remove the timber standing and growing on the lands described in the complaint, in accordance with the terms of a written conveyance of such timber to plaintiff, and quieting its title to said timber. The defendant denied plaintiff’s right to the timber upon that part of the described lands hereinafter referred to as the homestead and disclaimed any interest in the timber upon the remainder. The court gave judgment as prayed for in the complaint and the defendant appeals.

During the year 1879 J. C. La Tour and his wife,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sears v. AckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Ciapusci v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Fairbanks v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bolland v. O'NealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Goodrich v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Broughton v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Costa v. FawcettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Buffum v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API