Legal Opinion

Ayub v. Saloman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1923No. 1434PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of Case.

This suit was brought by Saloman against the appellants, Ayub, Revilla, and Lopez, to recover a balance of $3,000 due upon a negotiable note in the sum of $4,000, payable in monthly installments of $500 each, the first installment being due March 3, 1922, payable to the order of E. Azar, dated at El Paso, Tex., February 3, 1922, and transferred by Azar to Saloman. The place of payment is not specified in the note.

The evidence discloses that the notes were given in part payment for certain shares of stock purchased by the makers of the payee in the "Club Latino-Americano,"…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Oliphant v. MarkhamTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Van Winkle Gin & MacHinery Co. v. Citizens' Bank of BuffaloTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Wright v. John T. Hardie & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Dresser v. Missouri & Iowa Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Wilson v. DentonTexas Supreme Court · 1891

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. R.A. Hanson Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Ayub v. SalomanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Jack Tucker v. R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., Lockheed-California Company, Division of Lockheed Corporation, and H.K. Ferguson Company, A/K/A M.K. Ferguson Company, Defendants-Third Party v. The Owl Companies, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API