Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Denton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1891No. 3151PublishedCited by 39 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Presiding Judge,

Section B.—Suit by the appellants, J. O. & J. A. Wilson, against K. T. Denton and others to recover the possession of two promissory notes. The notes were in the possession of the City Rational Bank of Sulphur Springs, a defendant in the suit, which had them for collection. Cotter & McMullan, also appellees, intervened in the suit and claimed to own the notes, and asked for judgment for possession thereof. The notes were payable to plaintiffs'J. O. & J. A. Wilson, or bearer, and .were executed by J. H. McClimons, who was also a party defendant. They were for $1000…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kauffman & Runge v. RobeyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Cameron v. RomeleTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Davis v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Strong v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Aetna Insurance v. HolcombTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. West v. First Bap. Ch. of TaftTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Quanah, Acme & Pacific Railway Co. v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Worsham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API