Legal Opinion
Tucker v. R.A. Hanson Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 3, 1992No. 88-2105PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from an order granting summary judgment to third party defendant-appellee The Owl Companies (“Owl”) and dismissing the claim for indemnification brought against Owl by defendants-appellants the H.K. Ferguson Company (“Ferguson”) and Lockheed-California Company (“Lockheed”).
I
The plaintiff Jack Tucker was an employee of Owl when he was injured while working on a construction project at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. Lockheed was the prime contractor on the project and had contracted with Ferguson as contract manager to design and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Kasel v. Remington Arms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- City of Albuquerque v. BPLW Architects & Engineers, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- United Rentals Northwest, Inc. v. Yearout Mechanical, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. v. M & L InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Reagan v. McGee Drilling Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Amdura National Distribution Co. v. Amdura Corp. (In Re Amdura Corp.)District Court, D. Colorado · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.