Oliphant v. Markham
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Walker. Tried below before Hon. Norman G. Kittrell.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Associate Justice.
The plaintiff sued J. S. Markham and Thomas W. Markham upon a promissory note executed by them payable to her. J. S. Markham did not answer, but Thomas W. Markham appeared and pleaded, alleging, first, that the note was given for an illegal consideration and was therefore void, and in the second place that it was executed by him under duress.
In support of the first ground of defense it was alleged that the original consideration of the note was money loaned to and advanced to J. S. Markham by one J. B. Jones, as agent for the plaintiff, under the following…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Floyd v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Bennett v. FordIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Crawford v. CatoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
- Hazelrigg v. DonaldsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Ward v. ScarboroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Morrison v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- McDonough v. ZamoraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Potter County v. C. C. Slaughter Cattle Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Ferguson v. MansfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1924
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.