Legal Opinion

Wright v. John T. Hardie & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1895No. 350PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fifth District, in an appeal from Dallas County. The opinion sufficiently states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

—This case has been submitted upon its merits, together with a motion to dismiss the writ of error. The motion is made upon the ground that the application for the writ was not filed in time. The existing law provides, that the application shall be filed in the Court of Civil Appeals within thirty days after the overruling of the motion for a rehearing in that court. Laws 1895, p. 144. The motion for a rehearing in the Court of Civil Appeals was overruled on the 20th day of March last, and the application was not filed in that court until the 17th day of August. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Odum v. GarnerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Fisher v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. John T. Hardie & Co. v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Grant v. KidwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Van Winkle Gin & MacHinery Co. v. Citizens' Bank of BuffaloTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. At & T CORP. v. Rylander, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Prouty v. MusquizTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Hunter v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Harrington v. H. B. Claflin & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API