Legal Opinion
Jack Tucker v. R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., Lockheed-California Company, Division of Lockheed Corporation, and H.K. Ferguson Company, A/K/A M.K. Ferguson Company, Defendants-Third Party v. The Owl Companies, Third Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 3, 1992No. 88-2105PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
956 F.2d 215
Jack TUCKER, Plaintiff,
v.
R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., Defendant.
LOCKHEED-CALIFORNIA COMPANY, DIVISION OF LOCKHEED
CORPORATION, and H.K. Ferguson Company, a/k/a M.K.
Ferguson Company, Defendants-Third Party
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The OWL COMPANIES, Third Party Defendant-Appellee.
No. 88-2105.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
Feb. 3, 1992.
Larry D. Beall of Beall, Pelton, O'Brien & Brown, Albuquerque, N.M., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Sarah M. Bradley of Bradley & McCulloch, P.A., Albuquerque, N.M., for defendant-appellee.
Before HOLLOWAY, ANDERSON and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
HOLLOWAY…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Kasel v. Remington Arms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.