Legal Opinion

Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1986No. Appeal, 255 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

George Fuhrman (Claimant) appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s denial of Claimant’s petition for medical and hospital expenses arising from a work-related injury.

Claimant was employed by Clemens Supermarket (Employer) as a produce clerk when, on August 14, 1978, he fell from a truck while unloading produce and suffered a groin injury which included contusions of the penis and hemotoma of the anterior urethra resulting in urethral stricture. Claimant underwent various hospitalizations and medical procedures…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Deremer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Haley to Use v. MatthewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. DelCimmutoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Sekel v. IagenemmaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Chabotar v. S. Klein Department StoreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Tobias v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Berwick Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Loose v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API