Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
George Fuhrman (Claimant) appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s denial of Claimant’s petition for medical and hospital expenses arising from a work-related injury.
Claimant was employed by Clemens Supermarket (Employer) as a produce clerk when, on August 14, 1978, he fell from a truck while unloading produce and suffered a groin injury which included contusions of the penis and hemotoma of the anterior urethra resulting in urethral stricture. Claimant underwent various hospitalizations and medical procedures…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Deremer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Haley to Use v. MatthewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. DelCimmutoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Sekel v. IagenemmaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Chabotar v. S. Klein Department StoreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Tobias v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Berwick Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Loose v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.