Legal Opinion

Haley to Use v. Matthews

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1931No. Appeal 333PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Bambige, J.,

This appeal is from a judgment in an action of trespass. The facts were agreed upon and submitted to the court below in the form of a case stated.

The question presented is whether an employer, who claims the right of subrogation against the one who caused the injury to the employee, may recover the sums expended for medical and hospital bills. The answer depends upon the meaning of the word “compensation” as found in section 319 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act' of June 2,1915, P. L. 736 (77 P. S. sec. 671), which defines the subrogation rights of the employer as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Smith v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Scalise v. F. M. Venzie Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Frick's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Paolis v. Tower Hill Connellsville Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bumbarger v. BUMBARGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Smith v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Staller v. StallerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API