Sekel v. Iagenemma
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion' by
Hirt, J.,
Claimant, in the course of his employment, was struck across the mouth by the handle of a jack. The accident resulted in the destruction of. an artificial bridge of four teeth and a natural tooth to which the bridge had been anchored, all in the front of claimant’s mouth. He was treated by his own dentist who replaced the lost teeth with a new bridge of five artificial teeth at a cost of $168. He lost no time from his employment. In this proceeding the referee made, an award in the above amount “for dental expenses” under §306(e) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woodward v. Pittsburgh Engineering & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Midvale Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Keiser v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Toland v. Murphy Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Nemitz v. Air Services InternationalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Krivosh v. SharonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Legal Capital, LLC v. Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.