Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Inez Johnson (Claimant) appeals from the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board decision which affirmed the referee’s decision reducing the liability of Albert Einstein Medical Center (Respondent) to pay that portion of Claimant’s medical expenses which the referee determined was excessive, unreasonable, and unnecessary. Questions presented to this Court for review are whether the Board erred in affirming that part of the referee’s decision reducing the allowable medical expenses where the referee’s decision was based upon Respondent’s medical expert who did not physically examine…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Deremer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- M. A. Bruder & Son, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Glinka V.Workmens Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by22 opinions
- Loose v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Stonebraker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Moats v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Body Shop v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Consolidated Freightways v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.