Legal Opinion

Pacific Coast Dairy v. Police Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14318PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Contending that the act is unconstitutional, the appellant, Pacific Coast Dairy, petitioned the superior court for a writ of prohibition restraining the respondent Police Court of San Francisco from proceeding to try it upon the charge of having violated section 18 (b) of the General Dairy Law. The trial court denied the writ, and the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two, in an exhaustive opinion, prepared by Mr. Presiding Justice Nourse, affirmed the lower court. The cause was transferred here for further consideration of the contentions raised by the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. People v. . CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Amsel v. BrooksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API