Legal Opinion

United States v. Hallock

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 17, 1988No. 57,789; CM 448847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge:

In February 1986, appellant was tried at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, by a general court-martial composed of members. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of two specifications of wrongfully and dishonorably making a false official statement, in violation of Article 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 933. He was sentenced to dismissal from the service. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged. The Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence on February 20, 1987.

This Court granted review of the following…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. DugaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. RemaiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  4. United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. MorrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. LoukasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. BrisbaneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  3. United States v. StroudU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  4. United States v. GoldsmithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. QuillenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API