United States v. Morris
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLETCHER, Judge:
We granted (10 M.J. 334) review in the present case1 to consider the appropriateness of this military judge’s denial of a motion for mistrial. At trial appellant objected to an alleged pretrial admission of guilt to a South Korean security guard which was recited in the guard’s testimony *298at trial. Before us he urges that mistrial was the only sufficient remedy and that the military judge’s various jury instructions to disregard this testimony were insufficient to obviate the court members’ exposure to this supposedly inadmissible statement prejudicial to appellant.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. AnglinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. Joseph Patrick Tapio, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. StarrUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. HenryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. HolcombUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. RushatzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. RavenelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. GarcesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. SchakeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.