Legal Opinion

United States v. Stroud

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided December 2, 1988No. ACM 26511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

BLOMMERS, Judge:

The appellant was charged with desertion terminated by apprehension and missing movement by design. He entered pleas of not guilty to the offenses charged, but guilty to an absence without authority (AWOL) terminated by apprehension, a lesser included offense under the desertion charge. Electing trial by judge alone, he was found guilty of the unauthorized absence terminated by apprehension pursuant to his pleas, and also found guilty of missing movement as charged. The sentence, as adjudged and approved, extends to a bad conduct discharge, seven months confinement,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. GibsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. PalmiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  4. United States v. DugaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  5. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. GonzalezArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  2. United States v. GoldsmithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. KappleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. LutesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
  5. United States v. RayU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API