United States v. Goldsmith
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
KASTL, Senior Judge:
The principal question before us is whether it constitutes a false official statement for an officer to lie to a civilian cashier at the Officers’ Club who is inquiring about his account. To resolve that question — which we answer in the affirmative — it becomes necessary to analyze the law of false official statements under Article 107, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 907.
Factual Setting
Lieutenant Goldsmith was found guilty, upon mixed pleas, of writing five bad checks with the intent to deceive1 and making a false official statement, violations of Articles 123a and 107, UCMJ,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. HarrisonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. AronsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BarnardU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. BranoffU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. PraterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990