Legal Opinion

United States v. Goldsmith

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 18, 1990No. ACM 27775PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

The principal question before us is whether it constitutes a false official statement for an officer to lie to a civilian cashier at the Officers’ Club who is inquiring about his account. To resolve that question — which we answer in the affirmative — it becomes necessary to analyze the law of false official statements under Article 107, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 907.

Factual Setting

Lieutenant Goldsmith was found guilty, upon mixed pleas, of writing five bad checks with the intent to deceive1 and making a false official statement, violations of Articles 123a and 107, UCMJ,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. HarrisonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. AronsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BarnardU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. BranoffU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. PraterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API