Legal Opinion

Garretson v. Post

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 2007No. E041858PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GAUT, J.

1. Introduction

Plaintiff and respondent Robert A. Garretson (plaintiff) brought this action in connection with his purchase of two pieces of real property in Big Bear from defendant and appellant Deborah Post (defendant). When plaintiff defaulted on a $125,000 promissory note secured by a deed of trust on one of the two properties, defendant initiated nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings. After plaintiff paid the amount defendant demanded in order to avoid foreclosure, plaintiff brought the instant action, asserting seven causes of action, including a wrongful foreclosure cause…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Neville v. CHUDACOFFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Consumer Solutions Reo, LLC v. HilleryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  3. Century 21 Chamberlain & Associates v. HabermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Crossroads Investors, L.P. v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Schep v. Capital One, N.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API