Legal Opinion
Century 21 Chamberlain & Associates v. Haberman
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 17, 2009No. G040202PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IKOLA, J.
Defendant Lisa Haberman appeals from an order (1) denying her anti-SLAPP 1 motion to strike the complaint of plaintiffs Century 21 Chamberlain & Associates and David T. Chamberlain, and (2) continuing a hearing on her motion to compel arbitration. We affirm the order denying the anti-SLAPP motion and dismiss the appeal to the extent it challenges the order continuing the hearing on the motion to compel arbitration.
Resolving an issue of first impression, we hold the anti-SLAPP statute does not protect the act of initiating private contractual arbitration. The anti-SLAPP statute…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Komarova v. National Credit Acceptance, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Cross v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Manhattan Loft, LLC v. Mercury Liquors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Robles v. ChalilpoyilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- D.C. v. R.R.California Court of Appeal · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.