Legal Opinion

County of Mariposa v. Merced Irrigation District

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1948No. Sac. 5914PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Petitioner county, a political subdivision of the state, seeks by mandate to compel respondents, an irrigation district, a public corporation of the state, and its directors to discontinue proceedings to include real property within the district’s boundaries.

Respondent district is an irrigation district organized under the laws of this state (see, Wat. Code, div. II). Such districts are organized primarily for establishing a common water supply for irrigating the lands within the district. Respondent district, located in Merced County, owns land in petitioner Mariposa County, upon which some…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Rock Creek Water District v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Marin Hospital District v. RothmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Oakdale Irrigation District v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Rock Creek Water District v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API