Legal Opinion
Marin Hospital District v. Rothman
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 1983No. Civ. 52228PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
This appeal by Marin Hospital District, a special district (hereafter the District), concerns Government Code section 26912, a statute responsive to the demands of the state Constitution’s recently adopted (June 6, 1978) article XIH A, more commonly known as Proposition 13.
The District, a public entity and special district created by statute, had been authorized by law to levy a tax upon real property within its territorial limits. Relying upon other funding, it had not levied such a tax for the fiscal year 1977-1978, nor had such a tax been levied for it. Following…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- San Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection District v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- County of Los Angeles v. SasakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- County of Sonoma v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- City of Merced v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.