Oprean v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
in which MEYERS, PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON, HERVEY, and HOLCOMB, JJ„ joined.
The trial judge signed a pre-trial order, requiring that at least ten days before trial, the prosecutor give Oprean’s counsel all videos containing Oprean’s voice. Immediately before the trial’s punishment phase, Oprean’s attorney learned that the prosecutor had such a video. The prosecutor, over Oprean’s objection, introduced it into evidence. We must decide whether, under the particular facts of this case, the judge erred in admitting the tape. We hold that he did.
FACTS
On February 25, 2004, Judge Don Stricklin…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Hollowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- State v. LaRueCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
4Cited by208 opinions
- Dabney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Francis, Tracy BlaineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- James v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Hall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Greene v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.