Legal Opinion

Oprean v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 13, 2006No. PD-0669-05PublishedCited by 208 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.

in which MEYERS, PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON, HERVEY, and HOLCOMB, JJ„ joined.

The trial judge signed a pre-trial order, requiring that at least ten days before trial, the prosecutor give Oprean’s counsel all videos containing Oprean’s voice. Immediately before the trial’s punishment phase, Oprean’s attorney learned that the prosecutor had such a video. The prosecutor, over Oprean’s objection, introduced it into evidence. We must decide whether, under the particular facts of this case, the judge erred in admitting the tape. We hold that he did.

FACTS

On February 25, 2004, Judge Don Stricklin…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Hollowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. State v. LaRueCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

4Cited by208 opinions

  1. Dabney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Francis, Tracy BlaineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. James v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  4. Hall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  5. Greene v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009

203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API