Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 1993No. 70988PublishedCited by 251 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*33 OPINION

BAIRD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of capital murder. TexJPenal Code Ann. § 19.03(a)(2).1 The jury affirmatively answered the statutory punishment issues under Tex.Code Crim. Proc.Ann. art. 37.071.2 Appellant was sentenced to death. Id. at (e). Appeal to this Court is automatic. Id. at (h). We will affirm.

Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain either his conviction or the affirmative answers to the statutory punishment issues. Therefore, we will set forth only those facts necessary to the disposition of the points of error.

II

Insanity

In point of error…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rezac v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Stoker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by251 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Oprean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Ruffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Wheatfall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API