Legal Opinion

Guzman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 24, 1997No. 190-94PublishedCited by 5,682 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of possession of heroin and punishment was assessed at twenty years’ imprisonment. Texas Controlled Substances Act, Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. Section 481.115 (Vernon 1992). The Austin Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction and remanded the cause to the trial court. Guzman v. State, 867 S.W.2d 126 (Tex.App.—Austin 1993). In its petition for discretionary review, the State presented the following question:

“If an officer knows from prior training and experience…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5,682 opinions

  1. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. State v. KellyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

5,677 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API