State v. Ross
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtPrice, J.
MEYERS, MANSFIELD, HOLLAND, and JOHNSON, JJ., joined.
Appellee filed a motion to suppress evidence that alleged no probable cause for his arrest. At the hearing on the motion, the only witness to testify was the arresting Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TABC) agent. Following the testimony, the judge granted the motion and did not file findings of fact. On appeal, the Court of Appeals found that the agent’s testimony, if believed, showed reasonable suspicion for the initial detention and probable cause for the eventual arrest.1 However, the Court of Appeals held that the trial court,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- State v. BallardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Oles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,266 opinions
- State v. KellyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Wiede v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- State v. CullenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Montanez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
3,261 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.