Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Truck Insurance Exchange

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 12, 2001No. 20000167-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THORNE, Judge:

T1 Plaintiff Melvin Pollard (Pollard) appeals from the trial court's grant of Summary Judgment in favor of defendant Truck Insurance Exchange (TIE). We affirm.

FACTS

T2 The facts of this case are not in dispute. On July 14, 1997, Pollard, the sole owner of both Climate Source, Inc. and Pollard Mechanical, Inc., obtained commercial automobile insurance from TIE to protect the business vehicles (the "Commercial Policy"). The Commercial Policy, which identified fourteen specific vehicles used in the businesses, included Uninsured Motorist (UM) coverage with an express policy…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. McKeeTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hansen v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Nova Casualty Co. v. Able Construction, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Concrete Services, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Headwaters Resources, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Calhoun v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kraatz v. Heritage ImportsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  4. Chase v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  5. America First Credit Union v. Kier Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API