Legal Opinion
Chase v. Scott
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided December 20, 2001No. 20000933-CAPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Judge.
4 1 Appellant Mark Chase (Chase) appeals the trial court's award of attorney fees and costs to Appellees Lynn S. Scott and Frank Bjorndal (Developers) based on a contractual provision allowing for fees and costs to the prevailing party incurred in "litigation ... to enforce" the contract. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
" 2 This appeal arose from Chase's attempt to rescind a real estate contract. In the early 1980's, Developers, owners of property in Salt Lake County, undertook to subdivide that property. Part of the plan included contracting with a licensed land surveying company…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Cabrera v. CottrellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Nova Casualty Co. v. Able Construction, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
- Forrester v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Equitable Life & Casualty Insurance Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Moore v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Anderson & Karrenberg v. WarnickCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- STEVENSEN 3RD EAST, LC v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- Kraatz v. Heritage ImportsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- Foster v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.