Legal Opinion

Parrette v. Hutchison

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1985No. A025119PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AGLIANO, J.

The widow and daughter of Paul R. Parrette, as beneficiaries, petitioned the Monterey County Superior Court for orders (1) requiring S. R. Hutchison, trustee of decedent’s testamentary trust and of his inter vivos trust, to file accounts of his administration of each trust and to distribute assets, (2) determining reasonable fees for the trustee, and (3) removing Hutchison as trustee, and appointing a successor trustee. Hutchison objected, claiming that he was not subject to the jurisdiction of the court by virtue of the following provision in each trust: “No bond shall be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brock v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Reynolds v. FraysherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Wells Fargo Bank v. HuseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Auslen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Torrey Pines Bank v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Donkin v. DonkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Rock Springs Land and Timber, Inc. v. LoreWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Plumleigh v. FerberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Bucholtz v. BelsheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API