Auslen v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Petitioners (Harry, Richard and Donald Auslen) allege that respondents (the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and Judges Arnold and Henry of those courts) are simultaneously asserting jurisdiction over the same inter vivos trust. Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition restraining one or the other of respondent courts from proceeding further with respect to said trust. We have issued alternative writs of prohibition temporarily restraining both respondent courts from so proceeding.
Morris Auslen, individually and as administrator of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Franz v. BuderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Gilmaker v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Security First National Bank v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- City of Downey v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Estate of CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Mertens v. Kaiser Steel Retirement PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1990
- Neubrand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.