Legal Opinion

Brock v. Hall

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1949No. S. F. 17625PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

The sole question before us is the proper interpretation of an instrument by which defendant Elbert J. Hall created a trust for the benefit of his two daughters, Mildred and Carolyn. Mildred seeks to recover the assets of the trust on the theory that she became entitled thereto on the death of her sister Carolyn, and she has appealed from a judgment entered upon the sustaining of a general demurrer to the complaint.

The trust instrument which was executed in 1924 provided that the trustee was to hold the property transferred together with the net income until the two daughters, “Mildred Miriam…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Metcalf v. First Parish in FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Eustace v. DickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Franck v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Wilson v. ClotfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Burch v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Casey v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Copley v. CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Estate of Bixby v. Security First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API