Legal Opinion
Wells Fargo Bank v. Huse
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 1976No. Civ. 36790PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment construing certain language in an inter vivos trust agreement.
On June 27, 1923, Ida J. Moody (hereinafter “Mrs. Moody” or “trustor”) executed a trust agreement whereby she transferred to the trustee 5,000 shares of the capital stock of Moody Estate Company, a corporation. The net income from the triist was to be paid to the trustor for her life. At her death the trust was to be divided into two shares. One-third of the shares was to be held for Mrs. Moody’s daughter, Mai deB. Watson (“Mai”), who was to receive the income, dividends…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- In re the Construction of the Will of UpjohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Burch v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Copley v. CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Cairns v. CairnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Newman v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Estate of Harmon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.