Legal Opinion

Donkin v. Donkin

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2013No. S202210PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

Rodney E. Donkin and Mary E. Donkin, a married couple, executed a revocable trust in 1988 (the Family Trust) as part of their estate planning, naming their four children as equal primary beneficiaries after they both had died. Rodney died in 2002. Shortly before her death in 2005, Mary executed a second amendment to the Family Trust instrument (hereafter the Trust’s Second Amendment) altering the provisions governing the allocation of the Family Trust’s assets after her death. Both the Trust’s Second Amendment and the original Family Trust instrument contain a “no…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. CornettCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Burch v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Johnson v. GreenelshCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re Estate of BerglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Key v. Tyler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. DP Pham LLC v. CheadleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Doolittle v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Nathanson v. NathansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Urick v. Urick, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API