Legal Opinion
Doe v. Rapoport
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 4, 2003No. AC 23125PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*113 Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The defendants, Jonathan Rapoport, Haig Development, LLC, and Opus Management, Inc., appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting a prejudgment attachment in the amount of $1 million in favor of the plaintiffs, John Doe, Jane Doe, James Doe and Jeff Doe. On appeal, the defendants claim that (1) the court improperly found that the affidavit on which the court based its judgment was sufficient to establish probable cause under General Statutes § 52-278d, (2) the court improperly admitted into evidence a medical report pursuant to General Statutes § 52-174 (b) and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lopiano v. LopianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Shegog v. ZabreckyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Giordano v. GiordanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Fischel v. TKPK, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Bosco v. Arrowhead by Lake, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- LeBlanc v. New England Raceway, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Kendall v. AmsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. Sunrise Herbal Remedies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.